So, Senator David Boutin, which is it?
Many of the gun group representatives are in possession of numerous emails which were sent to Senator Boutin prior to the committee of conference meeting on SB 88. Those emails prove, without a doubt, that all of the gun groups -- PGNH, SAS, NHFC, GO-NH, and NRA -- had agreed on language to give NH citizens back their constitutional right to permitless carry.
A little birdie has whispered to many in the State House that Senator David Boutin used Constitutional Carry as a hostage to get a friend's government job reinstated by inserting it into the state budget. When the House denied that budget padding, he retaliated by killing Constitutional Carry in the Senate.
Is the birdie telling tales as is apt to happen in the halls of the State House? Or is the truth that Senator David Boutin simply doesn't support our right to carry without government's permission? Does Senator David Boutin think only those citizens who pay a fee to the State should be allowed to exercise their natural rights?
So, Senator Boutin, are you against permitless carry? Or are the rumors right, that you denied the rights of NH citizens because of petty political manipulation, just to get a friend his low-level government job back?
The supporters of the Constitution and the Second Amendment await your answer.
Senator Boutin -- are the rumors true?
[Posted Thursday, June 23, 2011, at 9:45 a.m.] Editor's note: This was sent to us from an anonymous source in the State House. It refers to our earlier article, http://pgnh.org/who_ultimately_killed_constitutional_carry_answer_senator_boutin .
Sincerely,
A Concerned Voter
|