Day of Resistance pro-gun rally - Saturday Feb. 23 = 2/23 = .223 - noon to 2 pm - State House, Concord

[Posted Sunday, February 17, 2013, at 7:25 p.m.]

This is a national event.  Go to, click on "Official Rally List" at the bottom of the page, and scroll down to New Hampshire.


ALERT FOR THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 21: FOUR gun bills (2 bad, 2 good) will have public hearings in Representatives’ Hall

[Posted Friday, February 15, 2013, at 12:40 a.m.] by Sam Cohen, Executive VP and CEO, Pro-Gun New Hampshire 


Please make every effort to attend the hearings and sign up to testify against the anti-gun bills and in favor of the pro-gun bills, or at least sign the "blue sheet" (for those not speaking) as OPPOSED or SUPPORT, as appropriate. Also note that as of last December, no weapons are allowed in Reps' Hall.

The Original Assault Rifle

[Posted Wednesday, February 13, 2013, at 9:30 p.m.]

By The Honorable David Welch, PGNH Senior Advisor 

The Original Assault Rifle 

In Boston, the British confiscated 1700 firelocks (as in "lock, stock, and barrel") with the caveat that they would soon be returned.  As far as I can determine, they never were.  The reason given for the confiscation?  "There was no need for hunting in the town."  HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF.

ALERT! HB290 hearing on Thursday February 21 -- FELONY for open carry in public buildings

[Posted Wednesday, February 13, 2013, at 3:45 p.m.]

The New Hampshire House of Representatives has finally scheduled the public hearing on HB290, a gun-control bill so horrible that they've scheduled the hearing for Representatives' Hall (which seats 399 people) rather than the committee room for the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee.  The hearing is at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, February 21.

We wrote about this bill earlier (February 1); see the article on our Pro-Gun New Hampshire website,, titled "Next NH anti-gun bill: FELONY for open carry."

Obama does NOT want your guns

[Posted Tuesday, February 12, 2013, at 5:20 p.m.]

By attorney Evan F. Nappen, PGNH Counsel

Recently, VP Joe Biden said, at a news conference in Philadelphia, that “any reports that suggest that [Obama] was trying to take weapons away from gun owners was [sic] a “bunch of malarkey.” He further stated that “it was important for the media to dissuade the American public from the idea that the Obama administration was prepared to do something unconstitutional on guns.”

This was very comforting to hear. They just want to calm gun owners’ fears. Biden wouldn’t be trying to lull gun owners into submission, would he?. I am glad to know the White House is not out to disarm us. So, I want to help clarify the Vice President’s message.  

Here are the proofs that Obama does NOT want your guns:

Next NH anti-gun bill: FELONY for open carry

[Posted Friday, February 1, 2013, at 1:45 p.m.]

HB290 is summarized as "AN ACT prohibiting unlicensed persons from openly carrying a pistol or revolver in a public building." Violation is a FELONY. The bill is sponsored by Delmar Burridge and Tim Robertson, two of the worst anti-gun members of the legislature -- and both of them sit on the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee, which has jurisdiction over gun bills (so of course they'll vote in committee for their own bill).

The only good news is that the bill hasn't yet been scheduled for a hearing.  We're writing about it now, however, because the anti-gun leadership of the House may well schedule its hearing on short notice, as they did with the "killer" anti-gun bill, HB135.  Please go to the last few articles on this website to read about that bill, and also to see the contact information for the eleven anti-gun members of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee -- so you can contact them in advance about HB290 as well as HB135 (which hasn't yet been voted on by the committee as of this date).

You can STILL save NH from bad gun laws

[Posted Sunday, January 27, 2013, at 6:20 p.m.]

By Sam Cohen, Executive Vice President and CEO, Pro-Gun New Hampshire

Last Tuesday, January 22, the NH House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee's hearing on HB 135 was moved twice: first, across the hall to a double room in the Legislative Office Building, and soon afterward, to Representative's Hall in the State House.  It is estimated that over 300 people attended the hearing, and 70 people testified -- 95 percent of them against the bill.  The hearing began at 1:30 p.m. and lasted until after 7:00 p.m.

GOOD gun bill coming up -- hearing Tuesday 1/29/13

[Posted Sunday, January 27, 2013, at 5:15 p.m.]

This Tuesday, January 29, at 1:30 p.m., the NH House Judiciary Committee will hold a public hearing on House Bill (HB) 388 in Room 208 of the Legislative Office Building (behind the State House).

State law RSA 650-C:1 is about safe storage of firearms.  This bill would add section 650-C:2, as follows:

"Civil Immunity. No person who stores or leaves on premises under that person’s control a loaded or unloaded firearm shall be held liable in a subsequent civil case for the criminal acts of another person who illegally obtains possession or control of such firearm and uses such firearm in the commission of a felony or a misdemeanor."

Rep. Shurtleff’s HB135 Endangers the Public

[Posted Wednesday, January 23, 2013, at 7:15 p.m.]

By Evan F. Nappen, Attorney at Law
General Counsel and Director, Pro-Gun New Hampshire, Inc.  

HB 135 does three things to endanger the public: 

(1) It permits and encourages rapists, kidnappers, and other violent criminals to civilly sue law-abiding citizens and police who lawfully defend themselves, by repealing New Hampshire’s self-defense immunity law.

First -- and very dangerous -- anti-gun bill of the 2013 NH legislative session

[Posted Friday, January 18, 2013, at 3:45 p.m.; updated Monday, January 21, 2013, at 11:25 a.m.] 

There will be a hearing on anti-gun bill HB135 before the NH House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee on Tuesday, January 22, at 1:30 p.m. in Room 204 of the Legislative Office Building (behind the State House).

This bill would create danger and hardship for the innocent, and encourage criminal attacks.  It reverses progress made on three fronts in previous legislative sessions, by: